
As soon as I opened the link of the New York Times article, Artist Sues The A.P. Over Obama Image, I quickly sided with the artist. As a painter myself, I have often used photographs to help me create a piece. I, however, do not believe I am violating copyright rules because the image I create is usually so vastly different than the original image.
Mr. Fairey's lawyer, Anthony T. Falzone, believes that his client only "used the photograph as a reference and transformed the image into a 'stunning, abstracted, and idealized visual image that created powerful new meaning and coveys a radically different message from that of the shot Mr. Garcia took." I agree with this statement. Looking at the photograph and then looking at the painting, I feel two different emotions are being conveyed. In the photograph, it looks like President Obama is looking at someone outside of the image. In the painting, it appears that Obama looks hopeful and ready to tackle on any problem or issue. I also do not believe the artist thought his image would become so popular and stir up so much controversy. Although Mr. Fairey's work was not a technical use of the Fair Use policies, I feel that he did not violate any copyright laws. He merely looked at an image of Obama to help him create his abstract work.





